Paul Geek My Personal Blog

Sony SDM-V72W Monitor

1. Introduction: How I Ended Up with a Sony SDM-V72W in 2025

It wasn't nostalgia. It was boredom.

One night, I was aimlessly scrolling through used-item websites when this Sony SDM-V-V72W appeared at a ridiculously tempting price. I had never seen one like it in Argentina. It had all the analog inputs that modern monitors lack. And besides… it was a Sony.

What could go wrong?

I asked the seller for a couple of photos, he showed me the basics, and since it was so cheap, I bought it without insisting on more details. My mistake.

Always ask for photos, people. Always.

When it arrived, it had a stain on the panel. It wasn't huge, but it was there. Instead of getting angry, I took it as an opportunity: if it already had a defect, at least it would serve as a good subject for an in-depth analysis of how this old monitor performs with retro consoles.

And that's exactly what you're about to read.

2. Model Features

The Sony SDM-V72W is a multimedia monitor manufactured in February 2003, right in the middle of the transition from CRT to LCD. It includes practically all the analog inputs used at the time:

🔵 VGA (RGBHV)

The cleanest and most stable signal on the monitor. Ideal for retro PCs, emulation, TV boxes, or consoles with a VGA adapter.

🟡 Composite (A/V)

Yellow (video) + red/white (audio). The worst possible quality for retro consoles on an LCD.

⚫ S-Video

Much better than composite, ideal for N64, PS1, or NTSC SNES. It's rare to find an LCD with a still-functioning S-Video input.

🔴🟢🔵 Component (YPbPr)

Theoretically the best analog input. On this monitor, it works, but with limitations: dull brightness and interference depending on the source.

🔌 External Sony 16.5V Power Supply

Standard for the era. Easier to replace than repairing internal power supplies.

🖤 "Anti-Cable" Rear Casing

Includes a detachable cover that hides the cables for a clean look. A detail no longer found in modern monitors.

🔩 VESA Mount

Another plus for mounting it on a wall or an articulated arm.

3. Actual Condition on Arrival (Panel Damage)

As soon as I turned it on, I noticed a branching stain on the right side. After testing with A/V, VGA, component, and different consoles, it was clear that:

it doesn't move
it doesn't change with the image
it's not dependent on the cable
it's not caused by interference
it's always in the same place

Diagnosis:

Panel damage due to humidity or polarizer delamination.

Repairable by a technician, but not a trivial fix. Since I bought it used, this conditioned the entire analysis.

4. Retro Console Tests

I tested real signals and compared the Sony LCD against a Sony WEGA CRT, using the same cable and the same console for a fair comparison.

4.1 SNES via A/V (Composite)

On the LCD:

video noise
static
washed-out colors
jagged edges
enlarged pixels
poor 240p to 480p scaling

On the CRT:

perfect smoothness
integrated dithering
natural colors
no harsh pixels

The CRT wins by a landslide. Composite on LCD was never good.

4.2 PS2 (RGB / Component / VGA)

VGA

The best quality on this monitor. Vibrant color, true sharpness, zero interference.

Component

Acceptable, but dull. May show interference or "double lines" depending on the signal.

Composite

Inefficient, just like with the SNES.

4.3 Emulation (PC via VGA)

Excellent:

clean image
accurate colors
good stability
acceptable input lag

Ideal for 8/16-bit emulators.

5. Direct Comparison: LCD vs. CRT (Same Console, Same Cable)

I did the most honest test: SNES via composite, on both the LCD and CRT, in the same room, with the same cable and conditions.

LCD

Shows all the flaws: noise, hard pixels, ugly scaling, interference.

CRT

Absolute smoothness. The composite signal is integrated as it was designed to be. The colors are organic.

This is the test that confirms why retro consoles were designed for CRTs.

6. How This LCD Handles 240p

Poorly, like all old LCDs.

it doesn't detect 240p
it interprets it as 480i
it applies generic deinterlacing
it loses sharpness
artifacts appear

It's not the Sony's fault; it's the technology's fault.

7. Real Advantages and Disadvantages for Retrogaming

🟩 Advantages

✔ Excellent VGA Quality

It shines here. Perfect for retro PCs, TV boxes, and emulation.

✔ Acceptable Component

It works, but it looks dull and can have some interference depending on the source.

✔ Built-in Speakers

Decent sound, no distortion. Good enough for a kitchen or desk.

✔ Nice and Rare Design

Attractive for Sony and retro tech collectors.

✔ VESA Mount

Perfect for hanging or using with an articulated arm.

🟥 Disadvantages

✘ Composite (A/V) Looks Bad

Like any LCD from that era.

✘ Component Doesn't Perform as It Should

Dull brightness and occasional interference. VGA is still better.

✘ Handles 240p Poorly

It deinterlaces and loses sharpness.

✘ Not Ideal as a Main Monitor

Viewing angles and brightness are far inferior to modern monitors.

🟦 Who Is This Monitor For?

✔ For Sony Fans

As a collector's item, it's beautiful.

✔ For Exclusive VGA Use

It performs really well in this mode. With a TV Box → great. With a retro PC → great. With emulators → great.

✔ As a Secondary TV

For the kitchen, workshop, or desk. Lightweight, okay speakers, VESA mount.

❌ For Retrogaming via A/V

No.

❌ For Retrogaming via Component

Usable, but poor compared to other options.

❌ As a Main Monitor

Not worth it.

🟦 Final Conclusion

Sony is Sony. This model has its charm and history, but the unit I reviewed was not new and came with a screen defect. That affects part of the experience.

If you're going to buy one used, see it in person or buy it knowing you can return it. LCDs from that era were already known for their subpar analog inputs, and this confirms it.

Still, if it had arrived without the stain, I probably would have kept it: if it survived until 2025, it's because it still has a long life ahead of it.